Uncategorized

“The Structured Writing Group: A Different Writing Center?” published

My short piece with Christopher Soper has appeared in the spring 2016 issue of The Second Draft. The full issue is available here on the Legal Writing Institute page for The Second Draft. You can find the text of our article here: The article describes the objectives, development, and some preliminary results of a program… Continue reading “The Structured Writing Group: A Different Writing Center?” published

Uncategorized

Perhaps too many conferences? But external deadlines are nice

I submitted proposals, either jointly or on my own, to present at five conferences next spring and summer. So far, four of the five have been accepted, and I have not yet heard on the fifth, but I’m almost dreading it will be accepted, too. I posted about RSA 2016 and CCCC 2016 before. The new… Continue reading Perhaps too many conferences? But external deadlines are nice

Uncategorized

RSA 2016–La même chose: Lawyers’ use of exemplary reasoning in persuasive writing

My proposal to speak at the Rhetoric Society of America conference here in Atlanta in May 2016 has been accepted. Here is the abstract: Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose. The more things change, the more the stay the same. The French proverb counsels one not to expect too much from change. But… Continue reading RSA 2016–La même chose: Lawyers’ use of exemplary reasoning in persuasive writing

Uncategorized

CCCC 2016 in Houston: New/now cognitivism proposal accepted

The organizers have accepted the roundtable proposal that I spearheaded for the 4Cs in Houston in April 2016. “New/now cognitivism: Strategies for theory and ‘literate action’” will include presentations from five scholars: Deborah Rossen-Knill, University of Rochester; Erin Williams, University of Saint Francis; Airlie Rose, UMass-Amherst; Jose Gomez, University of Texas, El Paso; and me.  Dr. Peter… Continue reading CCCC 2016 in Houston: New/now cognitivism proposal accepted

Uncategorized

Introducing “disciplinary, professional, and technical communication” (DP&TC)

The diversity of research in scientific and technical communication (S&TC) is both exciting and maddening: exciting because it permits researchers to approach the subject of S&TC using a wide variety of theoretical orientations, methodological approaches, and objects of study and analysis; maddening because the diversity makes it difficult to pin down “the” discipline of S&TC.… Continue reading Introducing “disciplinary, professional, and technical communication” (DP&TC)