Legal Argumentation: Fall 2023 draft OER text
(Updated Aug 8 with the current reference version and link to change long.) In spring 2023, I signed a contract with the Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction (CALI) to manage the editing of an open educational resource (OER) textbook for legal writing. It will be the first general legal-writing text from CALI’s eLangdell press. OER texts are available free of charge and can be remixed and reused under a Creative Commons license. Students who want a print copy will be able to order one, basically at cost, from CALI, but the text is most powerful in its electronic form, thanks Read More …
Legal scholars using Google Scholar for inter/multi/cross disciplinary research
I often read works in #LegalScholarship that exhibit ignorance of the considerable scholarship on the same topics in other fields. It’s as if legal scholars are trapped in the #LawReview searches on #Westlaw #Lexis and #HeinOnline. For example, in #LegalWriting #LRW scholarship, I note that scholars fail to check the research on related topics done in fields such as #rhetoric, #composition, #WritingStudies, and #TechnicalCommunication. Even if legal scholarship refers out to such scholarship, it often fails to consider the conversational context in which that scholarship falls: For example, citing or relying a book in another field without reviewing and considering Read More …
Burke on the conversation
Imagine that you enter a parlor. . . . When you arrive, others have long preceded you, and they are engaged in a heated discussion, a discussion too heated for them to pause and tell you exactly what it is about. . . . You listen for a while, until you decide that you have caught the tenor of the argument; then you put in your oar. Someone answers; you answer [them]; another comes to your defense . . . . However, the discussion is interminable. The hour grows late, you must depart. And you do depart, with the discussion still vigorously in progress. Philosophy of Literary Form Read More …
The “Why are you here?” of Legal Writing and Rhetoric
This post includes the video and handouts for for the session titled The “Why are you here?” of Legal Writing and Rhetoric, an on-demand session at the 2022 Conference on College Composition and Communication (CCCC), March 2022. This post includes the video of each of our three presenters and then also a video of a discussion among them with our chair/discussant. The videos will remain here indefinitely (CCCC is taking down its videos as of June 2022). This post includes our proposal with a summary of the sessions, followed by the individual videos and the group video. If you have Read More …
Contemporary Scholarly Methods (AALS LWRR session)
This post includes the slides and transcript from my comments at the upcoming AALS LWRR session on Thursday, January 6, 2022, titled “Contemporary Scholarly Methods and Works-In-Progress in Legal Communication.”
Centering students’ rhetorical knowledge: The community of inquiry as formative assessment
(Slightly updated December 4, 2021 with additional references.) In her book, Strategies and Techniques for Integrating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion into the Core Law Curriculum, Professor Teri McMurtry-Chubb (2022, p. 62) suggests a wide variety of interventions for law teachers seeking to “acknowledge the experiences of minoritized students and faculty and [to] seriously grappl[e] with their legal and societal implications.” She also expressly embraces the “community of inquiry” framework, which has received attention in the scholarly literature relating to the pedagogy of writing (see, e.g., Stewart, 2018). This essay describes an approach to peer review and classroom workshopping intended to develop Read More …
Tabbing your ALWD Guide: Not citation Nirvana, but close
For the ALWD Guide to achieve its full utility, you should adopt a system of tabbing it to make content more accessible. Over the last several years, I’ve developed such a system to use for my teaching and the occasional consulting work I do as of-counsel for my old log firm. Students say that they have found it useful for locating answers in the guide quickly. This video provides detailed instructions for how to do that. Read More …
What my 88-year-old aunt can help teach my law students
My aunt Kate Miller died on September 17 at age 88. Though I can’t say I was close to her, her experiences serve as part of an important lesson for my law students every year. Circumstances kept my nuclear family far away from the rest of my parents’ large families while I was growing up. “Katie,” as I knew her, was in my father’s high-school class and married my father’s brother Merlyn Larson in 1958. In my early days, I was likely to see her only at family holiday gatherings. I rarely saw her children, except the eldest, my cousin Read More …
Anti-racist writing assessment in the law
Stetson University School of Law’s Institute for the Advancement of Legal Communication sponsored a provocative presentation by Dr. Asao Inoue regarding anti-racist writing assessment on August 20. Though Inoue’s scholarly focus has been on the undergraduate curriculum, he directed his talk at some specific issues of legal-writing pedagogy. I posted on the Legal Writing listserv, noting: The talk was provocative and closely examined some challenges of adapting Inoue’s approach to the law-school and legal-writing classrooms…. I have tried some of these techniques with success (and some with less success), but there is much, much more I could be doing. Thanks Read More …
Legal Argumentation (2022 ed., fall 2021 version)
This is the second, and still profoundly drafty, version of the legal-writing textbook that I premiered last year. You can read all about it in last year’s blog post. I welcome your feedback. I’m really hoping to have all the chapters finished before next year’s edition. Here it is: https://rhetoricked.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Legal-Argumentation-fall-2021-ver.-FINAL.pdf